Showing posts with label Manila. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manila. Show all posts
on Friday, May 11, 2012
By DAVID DIZON
abs-cbnNEWS.com

How do banks find out if their clients are financing terrorists?

Gunawan Husin, head of the business community and management department of the Royal Bank of Scotland, posed this question to local law enforcement officers, including officials from the Anti-Money Laundering Council, in an anti-terrorism workshop Tuesday in Quezon City.

Husin, whose organization is a member of the Consortium for Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CCFT), said gone are the days when financial institutions could focus merely on making a profit without assessing the possible risks of becoming bankers of terrorist groups.

He said that despite stringent measures in financial and security areas, formal banking systems continue to be misused by terror-linked groups to raise and move funds to operational cells, which in turn are used for terror attacks.

"The financial sector is the first line of defense against terrorists. Since terrorists cannot thrive without money, it is important to strengthen our line of defense here even before the terrorist act is committed," he said.

Husin said law enforcement officials should focus less on the amounts being moved by the shell companies and more on how the money is being used to continue terrorist activities.


A report by the United Nations Monitoring Group in 2004 reveals that aside from the September 11 terror attacks, many terrorist attacks in the past did not require significant amounts of money to carry through.

"This only shows that terrorists don't have to have large amounts of cash to push through with their plans. It is these small, incremental amounts being coursed through nonprofit groups and charities that should be monitored especially if they are already being used for terrorist activities," he said.

John Solomon, head of World-Check Asia’s terrorism and insurgency research unit, said misuse of charities for financing terrorists is something already known to financial communities around the world. After all, charities are easy to form, have access to substantial funds, could be cash intensive, enjoy public trust and have legitimate reasons to operate in areas of conflict where terror groups roam.

He said banks should do their homework and know their clients better to find out if they have direct or even indirect links to terror groups.

"You have to follow the people involved and not the shell companies because it’s easy to change the names of the front organizations. Know-your-customer terrorism intel is the bedrock of countering terrorist financing," he said.

Husin said jihadist groups could infiltrate a charity organization by placing a member as a key financier of the charity. He said some nonprofit groups even connive with corrupt bank officers or government officials to bring the money to the terorist organization.

Tell-tale signs

Husin said there are several tell-tale signs on whether a charity organization's account could be used to finance terror groups. These include:

- An account opened in the name of a legal entity that is involved in the activities of an association or foundation whose aims are related to the claims or demands of a terrorist organization

- Account opened in the name of a foundation or an association, which contain sub-accounts in multiple currencies

- Account opened in the name of a foundation or an association with additional request for corporate ATMs and credit card account

- High asset value of a foundation or an association does not correspond to the charity’s information, as declared during account opening

He said the transaction profile of the account holder is also important including mixing of cash deposits and monetary instruments that do not appear to have any relation to the normal use of the account. He said large and frequent cash withdrawals and deposits made from and to a foundation’s business account is also suspicious.

He also pointed out that multiple accounts structure for a foundation or association is illogical.

"Heavier suspicion should be made if withdrawals and deposits are often made through different accounts, rather than one principal charity account. It is also suspicious when there are frequent internal transfers made between the accounts," he said.

He said use of wire transfers is also suspicious especially when a charity uses multiple accounts to collect and then funnel funds immediately to a small number of beneficiaries.

He said other tell-tale signs include sending or receiving funds by international transfers from and to locations of specific concern and transfers made to other banks without indication of the full name of beneficiary.

Finally, he said unusual or drastic shifts in financial flow of a charity organisation based in a country suspected of providing covers for terrorist financing or a charity organization dealing with location of concern, may provide warning signs of impending attacks

Individual accounts

For individual accounts, he said a client could also be considered as a terror financier if he refuses to provide information required to open the account and even attempts to reduce the level of information provided to the minimum, or provides information that is misleading or difficult to verify.

Husin said some individual accounts of terror supporters have unexplained inconsistencies arising from the process of identifying or verifying the customer including previous or current country of residence, country of issue of the passport, countries visited according to the passport, and documents furnished to confirm name, address and date of birth.

He said another red flag is when a client requests to open multiple accounts at a single bank with no apparent legitimate purpose. He said this is even more suspicious if the accounts have multiple individuals with signing authority, where these individuals have no relation among each other, either family or business.

Other warning signs include:

- High asset value of a client which is not compatible with client’s personal / business information

- Accounts that receive relevant periodical deposits and are dormant at other periods

- Closing of an account followed by opening of new accounts in the same name or by the name of the client’s family member

- Account profile is illogical, if an individual possesses numerous accounts with frequent internal transfers between these accounts

- Closing of an account or group of accounts linked to similar terror group, followed by transfers of all funds into related beneficiary owner, may suggest that a suicide operation is imminent.

Husin said banks should also check if an individual account carries out multiple transactions on the same day at the same branch but with an apparent attempt to use different tellers.

He said some terror supporters deposit or withdraw cash in amounts which fall consistently just below identification or reporting thresholds, but in aggregate are not commensurate with the declared income of the customer. Some even present uncounted funds and then reduce the amount just below a threshold, so as not to trigger reporting or identification requirements.

Moving out of banks

Arabinda Acharya, a manager of the Singapore-based International Center for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, said 50 percent of terrorist financing in Southeast Asia now comes from individual donations including zakat (alms) after governments tightened bank controls.

Acharya said some jihadist groups have moved their funds out from banks and invested them in stocks, gems, real estate, insurance and other financial instruments.

"We learned that Islamic militants in India were speculating in stocks and those in Africa were buying diamonds and other gem stones," he said.

He said al Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf Group was forced to go into kidnapping and extortion because the money it was getting from foreign and local donors was not enough to finance bombings. Citing a classified Philippine National Police report, Acharya said the Abu Sayyaf abandoned a plot in 2006 to blow up targets in Manila as well as build a chemical plant in the south because its funds from abroad were drying up.

Chief Superintendent Rodolfo Mendoza said the Abu Sayyaf collected an estimated US$31 million (1.4 billion pesos) from ransom payments and an unspecified amount from extortion between 1992 to 2007.

He added that the group also raised about 20 million pesos ($439,500) from zakat in the southern Philippines alone.

"Zakat has contributed a lot in the continuity of the struggle of the Abu Sayyaf," Mendoza said, adding the rebels had been using the Internet by showing Muslims' struggle in the south to gain more donations from people and groups abroad. With Reuters

Source: abs-cbnNEWS.com
on Wednesday, December 13, 2006
14 December 2006

The recent freezing of the Saudi-based International Islamic Relief Organization’s bank account in the Philippines by the order of a court on the request of the Philippine Anti-Money Laundering Council will do much harm to the thousands of Filipinos in Mindanao who benefit from the IIRO’s charitable work. The organization operates an orphanage in Mindanao, gives educational scholarships to hundreds of Filipino Muslims, has helped young Filipinos get married and has paid for the construction of scores of mosques there. Every year the IIRO provides at least 300 scholarships to local students, paying for them to study in Manila, Cebu and Cagayan de Oro. Not only does it pay their tuition but it also pays for their transportation from their hometowns to their points of study and in addition gives them a monthly stipend to pay for food and accommodation. “Many students are going to howl if their scholarships are stopped,” said a former Filipino scholarship holder to Arab News in an interview.

The IIRO’s secretary-general, Adnan Khalil Basha, has vigorously denied allegations that any of its funds have gone to help terrorist groups in the Philippines. He claims the freezing of the account is part of a concerted effort by some in the West to stop all Islamic relief efforts. And he may be right. In the aftermath of the Al-Qaeda Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York and the Pentagon, the United States has insisted that nations around the globe implement strict monitoring of all international money transfers.

In order to dispel any suspicions about how it uses its funds, the IIRO has strict internal policies that allow it to deposit money abroad only into accredited bank accounts that it maintains in countries where it operates. Not only that, but it employs a strict accounting procedure in which monthly financial reports document and track how the money was spent and who received it.

It is surely unfair for the Anti-Money Laundering Council to freeze the IIRO account merely because of American suspicions. It is perhaps telling that the freeze order issued is for 28 days only — which perhaps indicates that Manila is not convinced of the US accusation that the IIRO is using its funds to support the terrorist Abu Sayyaf Group and Jemaah Islamiyah.

The Philippine government should present any hard evidence that it has against the IIRO, or else unfreeze their account. The Philippines is not a banana republic and, as such, should show the world that it is not at the beck and call of the United States. Manila has many strategic interests in the Middle East and Saudi Arabia, not least of all nearly one million OFWs working in the Kingdom. They make real contributions to the country’s economy and this could be damaged if the IIRO is continually accused of something it is not guilty of. The account should be unfrozen immediately as a show of good will. The millions of riyals that the IIRO has spent in the Philippines have benefited Filipinos and no one else. It would be a shame to see that aid squandered just because of some misplaced and probably groundless suspicion originating in Washington.

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=90000&d=14&m=12&y=2006
on Sunday, December 10, 2006
CORRUPTION is defined by Webster as the act or fact of making, becoming, or being corrupt (morally unsound or debased); evil or wicked behavior; depravity; bribery or similar dishonest dealings; decay; putridity; rottenness.

On the other hand, The World Bank defines corruption as the abuse of public office for private gain. As dealt with by the Council of Europe’s Mul­tidis­ciplinary Group of Ministers, corruption is bribery and can be said to constitute the combined effect of monopoly of power plus discretion in decision-making in the absence of accountability.

Among the major causes of corruption are greed, circumstances, opportunities and other temptations that include party funds, money for patronage, apprehension of loss of office, need for extra money to maintain living standards, etc. Thus, it breeds a distrust of public institutions; it undermines ethical principles by rewarding those who are willing and able to pay bribes—hence, it perpetuates inequality, makes money laundering lucrative and establishes links between corruption and organized crime.

However, history reveals that the idea of corruption has not always been an open topic. Discussions on corruption are usually made in whispers and in secret to prevent possible persecution, ostracism and alienation.

Consequently, tyranny and corruption characterized most governments and corrupt government officials enjoyed the fruits of corruption without obstacle.

But the last three decades have seen a radical shift in the perception of corruption. The social malaise has come to be recognized and the general public has become aware, not only of its existence, but more importantly, its adverse effects on society. The fear and anxiety that came with discussion of corruption in the open slowly melted in the sunshine of public awareness. Significantly, people of the world grew to abhor corruption.

Ramon’s alma mater, the United Nations Asia and Far East Institute (UNAFEI), has taken a gigantic step in the paradigm shift the world is experiencing by portraying the weaknesses in anticorruption measures initiated by different countries. These are:

A. Legislation. Many countries have corruption punishable by penal code provisions only. The problem, however, lies in the actual implementation of the laws and the corrupt officials in the government.

B. Investigation. Many countries do not appear to have specialized investigative authorities against corruption. The investigators and prosecutors in said countries do not deal with corruption properly.

Reason: Their anticorruption agencies are open to informal influence by high-ranking officials that constitute several levels of hierarchical bureaucracy.

Furthermore, many countries do not have measures for anonymous complaints. Not much protection is given to whistle-blowers.

C. Trials. Some countries have a judiciary that enjoys the trust of the general public. However, the judiciary in other countries is not sufficiently independent to make fair judgments in corruption cases. Sometimes even the judiciary itself is corrupt.

D. Lack of political will. Many countries have governments that lack the political will to do their utmost to stamp out corruption. Political will to eradicate corruption can be described as the readiness and willingness on the part of the government and the citizenry as a whole to do so.

E. Lack of a code of ethics. Many countries do not possess a code of ethics. A code of ethics serves as a general guideline for government officials and employees to observe in the course of their official duties and functions. It is usually embodied in legislation. It underlines moral uprightness, official honesty and transparency, an appropriate standard of living and such other matters related to clean and honest governance at the personal level.

This may be viewed as closely linked with lack of political will.

(Items F, G, H, I, J on this descriptive list will appear on Wednesday).

This corner will portray next Wednesday the solutions to the forgoing problems.

http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2006/dec/02/yehey/opinion/20061202opi3.html