Showing posts with label Uganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Uganda. Show all posts
on Saturday, June 16, 2012
Bankers have expressed disappointment for the delayed passing of the Anti-Money Laundering Bill, which has been gathering dust on the Parliament shelves for about five years now.

The Bill, bankers say, is aimed at protecting Uganda’s money markets that are hugely susceptible to money laundering.

Speaking at a meeting in Kampala yesterday, Mr Lamin Manjang, the chairman of the Uganda Bankers Association and the chief executive officer of Standard Chartered Bank, said the law is needed to harmonise operations within the banking sector and protect it against fraud, theft and illegal acquisition of property.

He said: “There are guidelines that govern the banking sector; however the anti-money laundering law will provide a level playing ground and security while dealing with customers.”
The law also seeks to protect small and medium enterprises, one of the fastest growing bankable segments; however, much cannot be implemented without a functioning law.

Speaking at the same event, Mr Herman Kasekende, the head of consumer banking at Standard Chartered Bank, said the banking sector has developed a number of services including one-stop banking points, debit cards, borderless banking and online banking, however, such services need to be protected from fraudsters.

The banking sector has improved its penetration, especially in the SME segment, growing almost twice the rate of GDP in most markets across Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Kenya's Parliament finally passed the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Bill in December. But while the passing of the bill is viewed as a highlight of the Tenth Parliament, many fear it may just be a gimmick by the government to appease international partners.

George Kegoro, the executive director of International Commission of Jurists - Kenya Chapter, says while the legislation is good, he doubts there is political will to completely stamp out money laundering in Kenya.

"The existence of the legislation is not sufficient to deter the vice neither are the stiff penalties that are recommended in the bill," he says. "There is need for genuine support from the government to enact this law. We need a good set of people to be put in place to interpret the legislation."

Kegoro, whose organisation undertakes advocacy and policy work aimed at strengthening the role of lawyers and judges in protecting human rights and the rule of law, argues that while the bill was government-sponsored, Kenya’s track-record on corruption is poor and he doubts the genuineness of the political class.

It is the fourth attempt since 2004 to pass a bill to prevent the concealment of large profits from drug trafficking and other organised crime, and even this time around it faced resistance from members of parliament who believed the bill was a sly back-door re-introduction of an Anti-Terrorism Bill which had been quashed.

When the bill was tabled in November, an assistant minister in defiance of his own government, strongly opposed the tenets of the Bill. The assistant minister for public service, Aden Sugow, opposed the Bill saying it was an attack on the Muslim community. He argued implementing the Bill would be bowing to the interests of external interests and said that Kenya currently has adequate laws in place to deter money laundering.

While supporting the bill, defence minister Yusuf Hajji warned of a general feeling among the Muslim community that the legislation was targeting them. The Bill went forward after assurances from Prime Minister Raila Odinga that the government had no such intentions.

Once signed by the president, the law will establish a Financial Reporting Centre to assist in the identification of the proceeds of crime. An Asset Recovery Agency will be charged with tracing and recovering ill-gotten assets.

According to Job Ogonda executive director of international corruption watchdogs Transparency International, this would mean millions of dollars stashed in off-shore accounts swindled from Kenya could be recovered.

But Ogonda doubts the passage of new legislation will improve Kenya’s standing as a corrupt state internationally.

"At the moment it is embarrassing to be a Kenyan. Nigeria is improving with regards to corruption because they have shown tangible commitment of doing something about graft. However, the same cannot be said for Kenya," he says.

"We have previously had good pieces of legislation which would have helped fight graft, however, nothing has been done. How many ministers or former ministers have ever gone to prison because of corruption?" Ogonda wonders.

Ogonda is referring to anti-corruption legislation such as the Public Procurement and the Public Officers Ethics Act which require all public office holders to declare their wealth and origin of the same: this older legislation has had no noticeable effect.

Kenya’s record internationally as a corrupt state has for many years been bad and in the bribery and corruption index released by Transparency International, the country has kept the company of states such as Nigeria, Russia and Zimbabwe. Currently, Kenya is position 147 out of 180 on the global index of corruption.

Indeed the passing of the anti-money laundering bill comes in the wake of the release of a U.S. State Department report saying 93 million dollars of earnings from drug trafficking are laundered in the country’s financial system annually.

Another equally damning report by a UK firm, Kroll Associates, hired by the Kenyan government to track wealth acquired corruptly, revealed an estimated $1.7 billion is currently stashed in off-shore accounts. While the results of this 2004 report have remained confidential, the document was leaked: no action has been taken against any of the prominent figures named in its 110 pages.

But all the right noises were made when the bill was moved in Parliament by deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta, who said that in view of the magnitude of the problem to the economy, the debate should focus on the quality of the legislation to ensure it was stringent enough.

Seconding the bill, Raila said, "The country risks becoming a pariah state unless the legislation is passed. We have suffered from the effects of money laundering especially in the property sector whose value has been skyrocketing due to the money being brought from the acts of piracy off the coast of Somalia".

A boom in property prices in Nairobi is preventing a majority of Kenyans from buying real estate, and in some cases even pricing locals out of the rental market. Media reports are linking the boom with profits from Somali pirates who seized numerous vessels during 2009, extracting handsome fees from their owners before releasing ships and crew members. In certain Nairobi neighbourhoods, Somalis are willing and able to pay rent up front for periods of even up to two years.

Ogonda states that for many years, Kenya has been a hub of money laundering with illegally acquired cash from Europe, South Africa, South America, Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda and Tanzania finding its way into local financial markets.

"Due to our porous borders and poor implementation of legislation, people have simply walked in with huge amounts of cash, hired a lawyer to front for them who in turn invest the cash, especially in property," Ogonda says.

He says despite moves to assure the independence of the new watchdog agencies' leadership, and fresh monitoring requirements for the banking system, the version of the bill which is now awaiting presidential assent does not demand greater accountability from lawyers whose lawyer-client privileges remain intact.

Kegoro notes that the prescribed penalties are fairly high - jail terms of two to five years, with fines of up to $65,000 for individuals, and corporate penalties set as high as $330,000 or the value of the property. But, he argues, it is not the severity of the penalty that will make people fear it. It is the certainty of being caught, hence the need for genuine political will to implement the law.

Ogonda is in agreement. "Application of the bill is what will be the determining factor. The structure of governance has to support the law and if it remains the same the legislation can exist and nothing will change."

By Susan Anyangu-Amu

Source: IPS
on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
By Catherine Ndioo

In an era when geographical boundaries hardly matter in financial transactions, the use of money transfer services is becoming an everyday transaction.

For a commission, one can transfer funds overseas, send money upcountry, or pay for goods bought online.

"Money transfer is now a service that is part of many people’s lives, especially those who don’t have bank accounts," said Ms Nikki Spottiswood, MoneyGram International Regional Director.

Consequently, it is important to ensure that the money is safe till the transfer process is complete for users to gain confidence in the service.

A recent IMF report ranked Kenya as the second biggest recipient of foreign remittances in Sub-Saharan Africa after Nigeria due the growth of investment opportunities that have attracted the attention of the Diaspora.

World Bank statistics show that some Sh85 billion was wired into the country last year up from Sh67 billion the previous year.

Users should be sure about the reliability of the service provider when sending cash and be wary of offers that sound that sound too good.

Transaction Risks

Many fraudsters use transfer services for money laundering and other illegal activities like fraud, and one would not want to be caught in the web.

"To prevent unlawful transactions, money transfer providers usually seek clearance from the Central Bank when one is transferring huge amounts in a transaction," said Spottiswood.

When using the service, it is important to know the person who will receive money incase there is an error in the transaction.

Further, it is not advisable to use international money transfer services to pay for lotteries and online gambling because the money could end up in fraudsters pockets.

One should keep close tabs on transaction costs. These charges range from 0.5 per cent to 35 per cent of the amount being transferred.

For example, Western Union charges Sh1,150 to transfer less than Sh7,750 and Sh1,700 for amounts below Sh15,000. To send money to Uganda, Tanzania and Democratic Republic of Congo the charges are between Sh500 and Sh700.

PostaPay charges are determined by the amount and country the money is destined to. Sending Sh10,000 from Nairobi to the UK one pays a commission of Sh800, while Sh100,000 would attract a commission of Sh3,680.

Safaricom’s M-Pesa charges range between Sh30 and Sh400 for sending and receiving cash upto a maximum of Sh35,000.

MoneyGram charges a minimum of Sh480.

In all transactions, it is cheaper to transfer large amounts for both local and international transfers, due to a minimum fee charged for every transfer.

Commercial banks are major players in the electronic funds transfer (EFT) deals, servicing large users and to a smaller extent, low-income users.

EFT works is suitable for large transactions. The money is usually transferred directly into a bank account, making the money to be available to recipients at moments it has been wired.

Transaction Risks

To avoid penalties, always ensure that your account has sufficient funds instructing your bank to wire money and always keep an eye on commissions, which are usually a percentage of the money remitted.

It is also important to know the exchange rate used for international transfers. One should also know the minimum transaction amount and the different pay points so that the recipient can collect the money as quickly as possible.

To make it convenient for customers to send and receive cash, money transfer firms have penetrated remote places by signing in agents to their networks.

Western Union has local agents like Post Bank, Kenya Commercial Bank, Diamond Trust Bank among others, and has 300,000 agents worldwide.

Safaricom has signed up hundreds of agents for the M-Pesa service. The mobile firm has also partnered with financial institutions like Equity Bank, Post Bank and Housing Finance.

Moneygram services are accessible from Cooperative Bank, Stanbic, Prime Bank, I&M Bank and Imperial Bank branches.

PostaPay, available both for people sending money within Kenya as well as internationally, operates a network of 500 pay points.

Source: The Standard
on Monday, May 7, 2012
The chairperson of the parliamentary public accounts committee Hon. Nandali Mafabi has appealed to the government to table a bill on money laundering so as to reduce increased money crimes in the country.

Nandali who is also the MP for Budadiri West told journalists in Kampala that the country is loosing a lot of revenues because a lot of money is being transferred abroad for investment.

He says the revenues would help the country invest in education, health, roads and agriculture among others which are aimed at improving people’s livelihoods especially in the rural areas.

If the law is tabled and finally passed, people will be required to transfer a specific amount of money to banks outside Uganda.

Many senior government officials have been involved in money laundering including a senior presidential advisor who was arrested in the UK recently.

Source: UGPULSE
on Thursday, May 3, 2012
AllAfrica- Ugandan government officials traveling to the United Kingdom on diplomatic passports now face increased scrutiny and possible arrest after a presidential advisor was charged with money laundering last month.

Ananias Tumukunde, President Museveni's advisor on Science and Technology, was arrested in the United Kingdom on April 2 and charged with money laundering and being in possession of inexplicably too much money, according to British law.

A UK Home Office official told our source in London that more stringent measures would now be taken while handling Ugandan officials holding diplomatic passports.

"This is not an isolated or one-off incident, we now suspect most of these diplomatic passport holders from Uganda and there [will be] considerable scrutiny in all their dealing on the UK territories," the official said.

But the government remains adamant about its laissez-faire policy on diplomatic passports despite the arrest of a second Ugandan official in London in less than one year.

The Minister of State for Internal Affairs, Matia Kasaija says it is "alarmist" to review procedures under which diplomatic passports are issued "simply because a government official has been arrested abroad."

Ananias Tumukunde faces four counts of money laundering and being found in possession of £38,000, £12,000 and £53,000 respectively, contrary to sections 327 (2A) (b) (ii), 328 (3) (b) (ii) and 329(2A) (b) (ii) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in the United Kingdom.

Section 327 (2A) of the Act which deals with money laundering states that a person commits an offence if he/she conceals criminal property; disguises criminal property; converts criminal property or transfers criminal property.

According to the Act, concealing or disguising criminal property includes concealing or disguising its nature, source, location, disposition, movement or ownership or any rights with respect to it.

Under section 328, a person entering the UK is supposed to disclose to the authorities the amount of money in his possession.

Our sources in the UK say that Tumukunde did not disclose before hand that he was in possession of large sums of money which totals to UShs 360.5 million. Neither did he give a convincing explanation as to where the money was from and where it was headed, heightening suspicion that he was engaged in money laundering.

The Act was partly necessitated by the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the United States, which forced the UK to put in place measures to fight terrorism and its possible funding sources, such as money laundering.

On April 5, 2008 Tumukunde was arraigned before the Horseferry Road Magistrates in London but his application for bail was rejected on grounds that he did not present credible sureties.

One of the rejected sureties, we understand, was Fox Odoi, a legal advisor to President Museveni. By press time Odoi was reportedly still in London, pursuing the matter.

Tumukunde is scheduled to appear in court tomorrow [May 2, 2008] to seek bail for the second time. If convicted on all four counts he faces a possible 56 years in jail as each count carries a maximum penalty of 14 years.

Jotham Tumwesigye, the chairman of the Immigration Board which supervises the passport control department told The Weekly Observer this week that it was "unfortunate" that someone carrying a diplomatic passport had been arrested in the UK.

But he added that this development did not warrant changes in the way diplomatic passports are issued. Tumwesigye said: "It is true we should be concerned [about the arrest of a government official] but anybody including myself can commit crime. Does that mean we should stop giving passports to those who deserve them because we fear they will commit crime? It does not work that way."

Tumukunde's arrest comes less than a year after another Ugandan in possession of a diplomatic passport, Rose Birungi, was sentenced to 12 years in jail in the UK after she was convicted of drug trafficking.

Birungi, said to have been an aide to Gen. Salim Saleh, the Minister of State for Microfinance--was also the Minister of Information in Toro Kingdom.

Undiplomatic passport

Currently, the Immigration Directorate administers four types of passports-- diplomatic, official, ordinary, and East African passports.

Ordinary passports-- dark blue in colour-- are held by ordinary citizens while every Ugandan is entitled to an East African passport, used only within the East African Community.

Official passports- green in colour-are held by a certain category of important people in the country. These include; chancellors and vice chancellors of private universities, heads of government departments, MPs, leaders of the main religious groups in the country, members of permanent commissions, or any other person authorised by the minister of Foreign Affairs.

But the more coveted ones are the diplomatic passports--red in colour-- which give the holder unrestricted entry to almost every country.


Under the law, people entitled to hold these passports include:

government ministers and their spouses, Foreign Service officers and their spouses and children below the age of 18 year staying with them abroad, the head of the Public Service, the Chief Justice, Justices of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, Chancellors and Vice Chancellors of State Universities, the Governor and deputy Governor of Bank of Uganda, recognised traditional and cultural leaders, the Speaker and deputy Speaker of Parliament, Permanent Secretaries, Chairpersons and Vice Chairpersons of Permanent Commissions.

Unlike other types of passports, the diplomatic passports are issued upon recommendation by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the holder is supposed to surrender it upon relinquishing the position he/she holds.

Outside these categories, the law empowers the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to recommend anyone to be issued with a diplomatic passport, provided there is justification to do so.

Illegal access

But increasingly, it appears, many undeserving people are gaining access to the diplomatic passport under unclear circumstances.

The Weekly Observer has learnt that most of these people are on intelligence assignments and are given these passports usually under express orders from the powers above.

For instance, in 2004 the former Director General of the External Security Organisation (ESO), David Pulkol, revealed that government had given Micheal Ezra-- a sports philanthropist-- a diplomatic passport to enable him carry out duties on behalf of government.

"The circumstance under which that passport [of Ezra] was processed was to facilitate a meeting for some citizens to return to the country," Pulkol told a journalist then.

Other individuals, we have learnt, get the diplomatic passport, on the recommendation of high-ranking government officials. These people could include relatives of ministers or political aides such as Birungi, who ordinarily would not be entitled to one.

Indeed at the time of Birungi's arrest, government denied having given her a diplomatic passport. James Mugume, the acting Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs minister, said then: "Security persons are also concerned about how she got the diplomatic status."

Yet more often than not, it is such people who have ended up being caught at the wrong end of the law on foreign land.

MP Loi Kiryapawo (Budaka), chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee in Parliament, told The Weekly Observer that after the deliberations on the national budget, her committee would task government to explain the increasing abuse of the diplomatic passport by Ugandan officials.

She said: "They have to tell us [why Ugandan officials with diplomatic passports commit crime]. We have to tighten [the procedure of obtaining these passports] by seriously screening those who qualify to get them."

Asked whether they rigorously scrutinise applicants for diplomatic passports, Tumwesigye says their role stops at issuing them not determining who qualifies to get one.

"That is a matter of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs," he said.

Tumwesigye could also not tell the exact number of people in possession of diplomatic passports, although it is estimated to be in hundreds.

Efforts to get a comment from Mugume or any other senior official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were futile. Mugume's secretary said her boss was busy in what appeared to be endless meetings.
on Wednesday, April 11, 2012
By MARTIN LUTHER OKETCH

The huge amounts of money handled by private forex bureaus could be a threat to the country and the region if foreign exchange rules are disregarded, the Bank of Uganda has warned.

In a meeting held in Kampala by forex bureaus and money remittance operators on April 30, the executive director of bank supervision at the Bank of Uganda, Justine Bagyenda, raised the alarm on possible money laundering and financial terrorism.

She said the laid-down guidelines should be adhered to as the country awaits the enactment of the Anti Money Laundering Law.

A survey by the EastAfrican reveals that many operators are not complying with Know Your Customer requirements and procedures drafted by the central bank.

These procedures were issued to all forex bureaus and money remitters in August 2003 to assist in combating the vice in Uganda’s financial sector.

Said Ms Bagyenda: “For instance, some of you are not undertaking due diligence to ensure that customer identification details for large transactions are provided.”

She added: “We have noted that 90 per cent of the operators do not capture the sources of and the purposes of foreign exchange.

“This is very dangerous as it is a possible avenue for money laundering. You should comply with the law on declaring sources and purposes of foreign exchange, and the ‘know your customer’ measures that are crucial to turn down illegally-acquired funds and prevent possible financing terrorism.”

Foreign exchange regulations require dealers to report to the Bank of Uganda the details of any individual selling amounts in excess of $5,000.

Privately run foreign currency exchange bureaus and money remittance outlets handled 30 percent of the net foreign exchange transactions in Uganda in 2008, but the regulators are concerned by increased laxity.

The Bank of Uganda says the forex bureau and money remittance sector has remained largely buoyant, with a total of 122 forex bureaus and 75 money remittance outlets.

But a few were not following operational procedures regarding identification of clients, leaving the country open to money laundering.

Ms Bagyenda said an increase was reported in the inflows and outflows of licensed money remittances in the country that stood at the equivalent of $226.01 million in inflows and $104.20 million in outflows, at the close of December 2008.

This was a tremendous improvement compared with $99.44 million and $40.59 million recorded inflows and outflows during 2007.

Statistics from the bank show that total purchases in the forex bureaus market increased from $1.2 billion at the end of December 2007 to $1.5 billion at the end of December 2008, while total sales increased from $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion over the same period.

It is due to this performance that the Bank of Uganda continues to recognise the crucial role played by forex bureaus and money remitters as partners in deepening the financial sector and fostering macroeconomic stability and growth in the country, Ms Bagyenda said.

She added that increased risk aversion by investors and the effects of the global recession were presenting significant macroeconomic challenges to Uganda’s financial system.

If the global recession is prolonged, Uganda could face reduced export earnings, a decline in foreign direct investments and reduced remittances, which would significantly reduce the banking system liquidity and exert pressure on exchange rates and debt service capacity.

Uganda’s forex bureaus and money remitters operate under the Foreign Exchange Act of 2004 and the Foreign Exchange Remitters Act 2006.

The two Acts provide for exchange of foreign currencies in Uganda and making of international payments and transfer of foreign exchange; and for other related and incidental matters.

Ms Bagyenda promised more rigorous inspections to ensure compliance with laws through off-site and on-site surveillance of forex bureaus and money remittance sector.

In a related development, the bank’s assistant director of non-bank financial institutions, Benedict Ssekabira, said Uganda and Kenya had started harmonising the supervision of forex bureaus.

Two Bank of Uganda officials were to be in Kenya from May 4-8 for an insight into on-site and cash audit operations, he said.

Likewise, CBK officials have been in Uganda for lessons on risk-based supervision of commercial banks and financial institutions. The visits were arranged by a committee of the East African Monetary Community, which is handling the East African Monetary Union.

The East Community Monetary Committee Affairs — under the umbrella of the five governors of central banks of Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi — is trying to beat the 2012 target of fast-tracking the East African Monetary Union.

Source: The East African
on Tuesday, March 27, 2012
They talked in code. Cash was "gemoras." Money-laundering contacts were "washing machines." They met in cars, on a Brooklyn street corner, inside a bakery, and in a synagogue.

Tens of thousands of dollars in cash was transported in plastic bags, in boxes of Apple Jacks and Cinnabon Crunch cereal, and even a box decorated with Power Rangers stickers.

The men the FBI arrested July 23 and charged with being part of a massive international money-laundering scheme were, for all intent and purpose, "crime bosses," acting U.S. Attorney Ralph J. Marra Jr. said.

But at least several of them were, in fact, religious leaders in the tight-knit Syrian Jewish communities of Deal and Brooklyn, N.Y. They stand accused of using Jewish charities they controlled to launder millions of dollars in cash.

Court papers indicate that five rabbis and several other men were laundering money for an FBI cooperating witness who told them he needed to hide profits of his counterfeit handbag company, which produced knock-off versions of Prada, Gucci and Canali bags, which the witness said were sold for hundreds of dollars.

Sources have identified the witness as Solomon Dwek, 36, of Ocean Township, a disgraced real estate mogul who was arrested in May 2006 and charged with bank fraud. Dwek is accused of cashing a bad check for $25.2 million at a drive-in lane at PNC Bank branch in Eatontown. The bank spotted him the money, most of which he moved to other accounts. The bank was left with a $21 million loss when the check bounced, according to the FBI.

Brad Simon, a former federal prosecutor and assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said he is surprised the government's case appears to rely so heavily on the testimony of one key witness with a checkered past.

"This guy, at least from a defense attorney's point of view, seems like a treasure trove for defense purposes," said Simon, who is now a criminal defense attorney who represents clients accused of white collar crimes. "I would love to have the opportunity to cross-examine this guy."

Speaking to Brooklyn Rabbis Lavel Schwartz and Mordchai Fish in his car parked on a borough street in September 2008, the FBI's witness told them that a $50,000 check he was giving them to launder was "from the profits from the bags and the PNC," according to criminal complaints.

Fish, 56, and Schwartz, 57, both have been charged with money laundering.

The witness first infiltrated the money-laundering network, and then, in July 2007, began representing himself as a developer and the owner of a tile business to public officials in Hudson County, according to U.S. Attorney Marra.

The witness was eventually introduced to a web of public officials, council and mayoral candidates, and their associates, who took bribes in return for pledging their assistance in getting the witness's projects approved, or in steering contracts to him, Marra said.

When speaking to the targets of the money-laundering operation, Dwek openly discussed his bankruptcy problems, as well as the fact that he was involved in illegal businesses and bank frauds, according to sources and court records.

Dwek told the targets that his ongoing bankruptcy proceedings meant he had to conceal cash and assets, and that some of the money he needed to launder came from his "bank schnookie deals," a reference to bank fraud.

Prosecutors said they have hundreds of hours of video and audio recordings documenting much of the money laundering and bribes.

Marra called the money-laundering case "unprecedented" in the "number and prominence of the individuals involved."

The rabbis and their associates continued working with the witness even though they sometimes expressed concern about the possibility of getting caught.

In March, the witness was driving Fish to a Brooklyn meeting with Levi Deutsch, an Israeli who supplied cash for Fish's money-laundering operations. When the witness mentioned cross streets to which they were headed, Fish became nervous, according to court records.

"Don't even say the street. . . . in this car," Fish said, according to the complaints. The witness reassured Fish that "there's nothing. I had (the car) swept. Don't worry about it," to which Fish replied, "swept, shmept."

Latest corruption probe

The arrests marked the third phase of the "Operation Bid Rig," investigation by the FBI, the IRS Criminal Investigation Division and the U.S. Attorney's Office that began in Monmouth and Ocean counties 10 years ago.

The initial investigation became public in 2002 with the guilty plea of Ocean Township Mayor Terrence Weldon, who admitted extorting cash from several developers to influence approval of projects.

Forty-eight public officials have been convicted since the Operation Bid Rig investigation started in 1999.

On Thursday, another 44 people, including three mayors, two assemblymen, a Lakewood housing inspector and five rabbis were charged as part of a two-pronged investigation into political corruption and money laundering. Local Assemblyman Daniel M. Van Pelt, R-Ocean, was arrested on a charge of accepting $10,000 in a bribe.
Israeli cash

To start the money laundering, Dwek handed over checks — often made out to charities run by the religious leaders — and said they were proceeds of his illegal activities, sources and court papers indicate.

Three of the rabbis had connections to cash sources in Israel, and for a fee, those men in Israel made money available through "cash houses" run out of Brooklyn homes, offices and a bakery, according to court documents.

The men who ran those cash houses obtained the money at the direction of the co-conspirators in Israel, then gave the funds to the rabbis in Deal and Brooklyn, according to court papers.

The religious leaders took their cut, generally 10 percent, then turned over the remainder to the FBI witness, according to court papers.

During one meeting in Brooklyn, Eliahu Ben Haim, 58, of Long Branch, the principal rabbi of Congregation Ohel Yaacob in Deal who is accused of laundering $1.5 million, spoke with the witness about his cash source in Israel.

Ben Haim said he talked to the man every day or every other day, and said in the past four years, the Israeli man had the rabbi send out wires, under different names, all over the world, from Australia to New Zealand to Uganda, according to the FBI's complaint.

"It's unbelievable. I never saw anything like it," Ben Haim said, according to court documents. "I mean every country imaginable. Turkey, you can't believe it. . . . All different names. It's never the same name. . . . Switzerland, everywhere, France, everywhere, Spain . . . China, Japan."

In another method, the witness would bring a check to two other rabbis, Saul Kassin, 87, and Edmond Nahum, 56, principal rabbi at the Synagogue of Deal, according to prosecutors. Kassin is the spiritual leader of 75,000 Syrian Jews in Brooklyn.

Prosecutors said the rabbis would write the witness checks from a charity bank account for a slightly smaller amount, payable to the entity of his choice.

The witness then cashed the Kassin checks through Ben Haim, authorities said.

Criminal complaints say Kassin laundered more than $200,000 and Nahum laundered about $185,000.

Lawyers for the two men said they are innocent.

Nahum's attorney, Justin P. Walder, said the rabbi looks forward to clearing his name at trial. The rabbi has headed the Deal synagogue for many years, is well-established in the community and is married with four children, he said.

Walder did not mention Dwek by name, but said his client had been taken advantage of by a man who had known the rabbi for a long time.

"We intend to establish that his goodness was utilized by a person who was seeking to be absolved for his immense wrongful conduct by implicating another," Walder said. "Obviously, this man, under the system that exists in the federal court, the way he can get the best deal for himself is to implicate another, and obviously he took advantage of the rabbi."

Source: APP.COM
on Sunday, February 12, 2012
East African countries have admitted they are vulnerable to global money laundering. They are calling for specialised training and increased information sharing to confront the ogre.

A peace and security conference for the East African Community (EAC) in Kampala, Uganda last week, agreed that the region’s security agencies should be computer literate as technology becomes the more preferred channel for committing certain crimes.

The admission gives hope that the region will strengthen its anti-money laundering laws.

“Countries in the region need to do everything in their power to adopt the international standards pertaining to greater scrutiny of financial transactions,” said a communiqué from the conference.

“Client due diligence, honing and sharpening the technical and technological skills of investigators and enforcers, as well as intensifying information sharing between nations and agencies.”

Kenya is yet to make an anti-money laundering law despite the exposure to criminals like the pirates in the Indian Ocean, who have admitted using Kenya and Dubai as their preferred money laundering destinations.

The proposed law is yet to be debated in parliament.

In Uganda, it is only last month that the draft Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Bill was presented to Uganda’s Parliament, where it will be debated over the next two months.

Rwanda Parliament last year approved anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism law.

With the law in place, a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a national agency charged with receiving, processing, analysing and disseminating information relating to suspect financial transactions is to be formed.

It was not clear if this unit has already been formed but, it is such agencies that are expected to be formed across the region to facilitate exchange of information on suspicious financial transactions.

Source: Africa Business Daily by Steve Mbogo
on Wednesday, December 20, 2006
BARCLAYS Bank is cutting ties with forex bureaux over suspected money laundering. The bank has issued a notice of intent to close down accounts of all the 92 forex bureaux it is holding by December 29.

Notices have been sent to respective bureaux. The bank is, however, tight-lipped on the details of the suspected money laundering and the bureaux involved.

But commercial bank sources said the move was prompted by lack of a clear inflow and outflow of unspecified sums of money into the country. Some of this money is suspected to be 'dirty money' which is against the international practice. "We hereby give you notice of our intention to terminate our relationship with you and please note that as at close of business on December 29, your accounts with Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited shall be closed," read a notice.

However, Nick Mbuvi, the Barclays Bank managing director, explained that the bank deals with customers on a case-to-case basis but addimtted that they would close all forex bureaux accounts.

Some bureaux contacted said they were disappointed with the bank's move.

"I think Barclays is looking at us as competitors. They also think that other banks will follow this move to kill competition," a forex bureaux source said.

The central bank sources added that Barclays claims that the forex bureaux were not giving adequate information about their clients.

"The bank might be disengaging from the bureaux after getting proof that their clients engage in money laundering," the source stated.

http://allafrica.com/stories/200612180173.html
Sunday, 17th December, 2006

By Peter Kaujju
and Macrines Nyapendi

BARCLAYS Bank is cutting ties with forex bureaux over suspected money laundering. The bank has issued a notice of intent to close down accounts of all the 92 forex bureaux it is holding by December 29.

Notices have been sent to respective bureaux. The bank is, however, tight-lipped on the details of the suspected money laundering and the bureaux involved.

But commercial bank sources said the move was prompted by lack of a clear inflow and outflow of unspecified sums of money into the country. Some of this money is suspected to be ‘dirty money’ which is against the international practice. “We hereby give you notice of our intention to terminate our relationship with you and please note that as at close of business on December 29, your accounts with Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited shall be closed,” read a notice.

However, Nick Mbuvi, the Barclays Bank managing director, explained that the bank deals with customers on a case-to-case basis but addimtted that they would close all forex bureaux accounts.

Some bureaux contacted said they were disappointed with the bank’s move.

“I think Barclays is looking at us as competitors. They also think that other banks will follow this move to kill competition,” a forex bureaux source said.

The central bank sources added that Barclays claims that the forex bureaux were not giving adequate information about their clients.

“The bank might be disengaging from the bureaux after getting proof that their clients engage in money laundering,” the source stated.

http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/220/538383